Malvern, PA (PRWEB) December 04, 2012
According to a new study from the Insurance Research Council (IRC), a states percentage of uninsured motorists is affected by a no pay, no play laws enactment, albeit modestly. A statistical model developed by IRC estimated that the uninsured motorist (UM) rate can fall by as much as 1.6 percent after a state adopts a no pay, no play law.
Currently, ten states have no pay, no play laws on the books: Alaska, California, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Oregon. In the study, The Potential Effects of No Pay, No Play Laws, IRC provides a background on each existing state law.
For states without a no pay, no play law in effect,* IRC developed a mathematical model to estimate the compensation for noneconomic loss paid to uninsured third-party liability claimants in a given year. This estimate provides a reasonable upper limit proxy for the amount of money that is currently awarded to the uninsured population and would no longer be paid if a state implemented a strict no pay, no play law.
Across all of the 39 states studied using 2007 data, the average noneconomic loss paid to uninsured claimants per state was $ 17.5 million. These findings suggest the average insured driver in 2007 paid an additional $ 4.69 ($ 5.10 in 2012 dollars) to address the average $ 17.5 million in noneconomic loss ($ 19.3 million on average in 2012 dollars) that was awarded to uninsured claimants in each state.
The original intent of these laws was to relieve at-fault drivers who comply with state insurance requirements from having to compensate uninsured drivers for noneconomic damages. Yet, little research had been conducted analyzing the effect of no pay, no play laws on the overall insurance market, said Elizabeth Sprinkel, senior vice president of IRC. With this study, we now have more information on how these laws affect the population of motorists driving uninsured. This report, which also develops cost estimates for states that do not have no pay, no play laws on the books, highlights the benefits a strict law may provide to the average insured consumer.
For more detailed information on the studys methodology and findings, contact David Corum at (484) 831-9046 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Copies of the study are available for $ 300 for an electronic version, or $ 400 for a printed copy. Visit IRCs website at http://www.insurance-research.org for more information.
###
NOTE TO EDITORS: The Insurance Research Council is a division of The Institutes. The Institutes are the leader in delivering proven knowledge solutions that drive powerful business results for the risk management and property-casualty insurance industry. The Institutes knowledge solutions include the CPCU designation program; associate designation programs in areas such as claims, risk management, underwriting, and reinsurance; introductory and foundation programs; online courses; research; custom solutions; assessment tools; and continuing education (CE) courses for licensed insurance professionals and adjusters through their CEU.com compliance unit.
The IRC provides timely and reliable research to all parties involved in public policy issues affecting insurance companies and their customers. The IRC does not lobby or advocate legislative positions. It is supported by leading property-casualty insurance organizations.
Texas was excluded due to lack of data.